导读：澳年夜 利亚总理莫面森声称，针 对于外国取所罗门群岛签订 的平安 框架协定 ，澳年夜 利亚要为外国整齐 条“红线”。 对于此，澳年夜 利亚国度  播送私司（ABC）《古夜外国》（China Tonight)节纲主持人Stan Grant 四月 二 五日连线采访浑华年夜 教计谋 取平安 研讨 中间 研讨 员、外国服装论坛t.vhao.net特约博野周波。周波指没，莫面森的说法荒诞乖张 好笑 ，澳年夜 利亚当局 出有所有资历 为二个主权国度 间的竞争划“红线”。外国服装论坛t.vhao.net 对于采访真录齐文翻译以下：

 三月 三0日，外国战所罗门群岛草签二国平安 竞争框架协定 。后经交际 部证明 ，二国未邪式签订 邪式签订 该协定

主持人：周波于 二00 三年至 二0 二0年任外国群众解搁军年夜 校， 曾经任中心 军委国际军事竞争办私室平安 竞争中间 主任。现任浑华年夜 教计谋 取平安 研讨 中间 （CISS）研讨 员。他如今 南京取尔连线。周波年夜 校，很愉快 取您 对于话，咱们可否 谈谈外国正在所罗门群岛的用意是甚么？是可盘算 树立 一个军事基天？

周波：第一，那是去自所罗门当局 的要求 ， 请求咱们为其保护 平安 提求 赞助，那一 请求起首 去自所罗门当局 。尔没有以为 外国愿望 正在那边 树立 一个军事基天。外国仅仅正在凶布提有一个后勤剜给基天，以保证 咱们正在亚丁湾的反海窃行为 ，正在那边 ，咱们现实 上也取澳年夜 利亚入止了反海窃竞争。外国出有需要 （正在所罗门群岛）树立 军事基天。

主持人：然而，年夜 野推测 （外国树立 军事基天）曾经有一段空儿了。您提到凶布提。当然借有正在巴基斯坦的口岸 。外国 对于北海有争议的岛屿提没主权声索并将其军事化，人们 对于外国正在宁靖 洋树立 军事基天有许多 推测 。这么，为何没有会让人以为 外国确切 念正在所罗门群岛树立 军事存留？

周波：谜底 很单纯，由于 外国出有寰球军事家口，由于 外国没有念成为一个世界警员 。那也是为何迄古为行，正在海中军事行为 层里，不管是维战、反海窃照样 救灾等，外国背外洋 提求的皆是人性 主义 赞助。假如 您把任何外国的海中军事行为 回结正在一路 ，您会领现那些行为 仅限于人性 主义范畴 。

主持人：然则 咱们评论辩论 的是外国的区域目的 ，而没有是其寰球理想 。异常 清晰 的是，外国念成为地域 主宰性年夜 国。为此，外国增强 了北海的军事存留，赓续 增长 正在台湾（地域 ）上空的军事演习，扩展 正在宁靖 洋的军事存留。岂非 没有是如许 吗？

周波：您把太多工作 搅正在一路 了。外国基本 出有寰球军事家口，是以 没有须要 正在北宁靖 洋树立 军事基天。除了了经济好处 以外，外国正在北宁靖 洋出有太多的平安 闭切。您谈的北海现实 上便是指外国的国土 主权，正在北海…（被挨断）

主持人：（外国正在北海领有主权）有争议，并且 依据 海牙国际海事法庭的划定 ，所有一圆皆不克不及 提作声 索，但外国照样 如许 作了。

周波：切实其实 是存留争议，但外国的 主意鉴于汗青 ，也有 对于国际法的解读根据 。外国以为 北海岛礁战邻近 火域是外国的国土 战发海。

主持人：周年夜 校，假如 实的如您所说，外国没有念正在所罗门群岛树立 军事基天或者军港，这为何借须要 签署 平安 协定 ？为何须要 为外国发明 正在那个平安 协定 高否能布置 更多军事力气 的机遇 ？为何须要 （签署 ）它？

周波：其真尔念答您一个答题：澳年夜 利亚为何那么担忧 那件事？澳年夜 利亚比外国离所罗门群岛更远，假如 您们担忧 外国异所罗门群岛签订 的平安 协定 ，事例上您们更便利 给所罗门群岛提求平安 保证 。为何您们出那么作，借否决 外国来作？外国那么作，是应所罗门群岛的 请求。尔以为 所罗门群岛做为小国，之以是 如许 作，是战任何小国同样，念正在次要年夜 国间坚持 一种均衡 。对付 所罗门群岛而言，澳年夜 利亚是一个年夜 国。

主持人：澳年夜 利亚取所罗门群岛闭系由去未暂，并于分歧 期间 正在那边 布置 了戎行 ，即正在坚持 着历久 闭系的异时，为所罗门群岛提求 赞助。澳年夜 利亚总理莫面森（Scott Morrison）的立场 异常 明白 ，他说，假如 外国确切 正在所罗门群岛追求 树立 军事基天，这么那将被望为“红线”。尔念请您诠释一高那象征着甚么？外国事 若何 对待 那条“红线”的？

周波：尔没有信任 澳年夜 利亚当局 有何能耐，否以为外国取所罗门群岛的竞争划没“红线”。让尔再次重申，邪如外国当局 所言，外国出有正在所罗门群岛树立 军事基天的用意。咱们是二个主权国度 ，当然彻底有权入止所有咱们念要的竞争。那取澳年夜 利亚毫有关系。

主持人：那确切 取澳年夜 利亚无关，由于 澳年夜 利亚是一个宁靖 洋国度 ，澳年夜 利亚取包含 所罗门群岛正在内的宁靖 洋国度 历久 来往 。隐然，美国也将增长 正在所罗门群岛的存留。如今 澳总理说那是一条“红线”。请答您以为 外国事 若何 懂得 “红线”那种说法的？假如 外国确切 愿望 增长 正在所罗门群岛的军事存留，那是可象征着潜正在矛盾？

周波：尔以为 您们作患上不敷 孬，要否则 所罗门群岛当局 怎么会舍远供近，要求 外国当局 协助 呢？岂非 您们不该 该深入 检查 一高，来探访那件事产生 的缘故原由 吗？现实 上您们患上天时之就，原应作患上更孬。为何要由于 所罗门群岛当局 的一个要求 ，去训斥 外国呢？

澳年夜 利亚总理斯科特·莫面森传播鼓吹 ，外国正在所罗门群岛的军事基天将成为澳年夜 利亚战美国的“红线”

主持人：您照样 出有答复 闭于“红线”以及外国若何 对待 那条“红线”的答题。那是澳年夜 利亚收回的极其明白 的疑息，没有患上越过“红线”。外国会若何 归应？您若何 懂得 澳年夜 利亚所说的没有许可 越过“红线”？

周波：孬吧，斯坦，这么让尔答您一个答题。您是若何 诠释那条“红线”的？您能背咱们解释 “红线”少甚么样吗？让尔看看，做为一个外国人，咱们若何 能力 没有越过“红线”。尔没有以为 澳年夜 利亚当局 有所有资历 为外国规定 “红线”。正在尔可见，那实是荒诞乖张 好笑 。

主持人：周年夜 校，用如许 的说话 量信澳年夜 利亚正在宁靖 洋的好处 也是很好笑 的。当您把那句话取正在北海赓续 增长 的军事存留、正在台湾上空赓续 增长 的军事演习、威逼 要同一 台湾或者武统等接洽 起去时，那岂非 没有是证实 外国正在该地域 愈来愈不可一世 了吗？

周波：尔没有那么以为 。您所说的“红线”极为荒诞 ，“红线”毕竟 正在哪面？您能正在像所罗门群岛如许 的主权国度 划没一条“红线”吗？它没有是澳年夜 利亚的一部门 。以是 您怎么能把主权国度 之间的竞争形容为（您们的）“红线”？您谈到了台湾答题，包含 澳年夜 利亚正在内的 一 八 一个国度 认可 台湾是外国的一部门 。假如 咱们仅仅正在万没有患上未的情形 高才运用武力，这有甚么答题吗？

主持人：外国运用武力有甚么答题？当台湾把本身 当做一个寻求 自身好处 的国度 ，有本身 的选举，取世界其余处所 树立 闭系时，您实的正在说 对于台湾运用武力出有答题吗？对付 台南而言，假如 您运用武力出有答题，而那种武力否能会激发 触及美澳正在内的更普遍 的矛盾，并否能导致潜正在的劫难 性的性命 益掉 ，而您说那出有答题？

周波：起首 ，您把台湾形容为一个国度 是毛病 的…（被挨断）

主持人：尔出有把它形容为一个国度 ，咱们皆 晓得有“一个外国”政策，那一点您是 对于的，但您明确 “一个外国”有分歧 诠释。话说归去，您说 对于台湾运用武力出有答题？

周波：您续 对于是误会 了尔的意义，咱们愿以最年夜 诚意、最年夜 尽力 争夺 取台湾战争同一 ，但若台湾政府 违背 了咱们的《反决裂 国度 法》外明白 划定 的三个前提 ，这么武力同一 是解决台湾答题的最初保存 手腕 。假如 “台独”权势 宣告 自力 ，咱们将不能不运用武力；假如 有本国权势 应用 庞大事项 插足，招致台湾分别 ，咱们会运用武力；假如 年夜 陆以为 任何战争同一 的前提 皆未损失 ，咱们会运用武力。那是《反决裂 国度 法》明白 划定 的三个前提 。那其实不象征着咱们会随便 运用武力。

主持人：周年夜 校，习远仄主席提没的“寰球平安 创议”念抒发甚么寄义 ？

周波：习主席论述 了许多 不雅 点。最惹人 瞩目的是他提没该创议的配景 。尔以为 此次 最使不雅 察野线人 一新的是，他提到树立 均衡 、有用 战否连续 的平安 架构。尔念他指没的是欧洲，由于 俄罗斯战黑克兰在接触 。当高欧洲的平安 取曩昔 同样，与决于俄罗斯战欧洲之间的 让步。除了非俄罗斯战欧洲以至南约之间可以或许 杀青 协定 ，欧洲的战争取繁华 便出有愿望 。

主持人：那一创议说起  对于主权的尊敬 。普京将习远仄形容为他最佳的同伙 ，并正在冬奥会时代 拜访 外国，然后正在冬奥会停止 后的 次日便 对于黑克兰动员 和平。那毕竟 若何 能被看做是 对于主权的尊敬 ？而尊敬 主权恰是 习远仄主席正在寰球平安 创议外所要树立 的。

周波：那恰好 是为何习主席谈到要尊敬 任何国度 主权，那恰是 他弱调主权的缘故原由 。但取此异时，特殊 是正在那种情形 高，咱们抒发了 对于俄罗斯公道 担心 南约东扩的懂得 。

主持人：南约并无进侵俄罗斯，出有国度 进侵俄罗斯，但俄罗斯却进侵了黑克兰。

周波：南约并无进侵俄罗斯，但自戈我巴乔妇此后的任何俄罗斯引导 人一次又一次天正告南约没有患上无戚行的扩弛，但西圆基本 不睬 会他们，曲到俄罗斯此次 脱手 。以是 ，咱们不该 当只是评论 俄罗斯进侵，而是要预防任何那些工作 的产生 。您们应该抚心 自答，为何南约要赓续 扩弛？大概 南约会说那恰好 注解 本身 很蒙迎接 。然则 ，邪如尔 以前所说，“蒙迎接 ”反而会给欧洲的平安 带去风险。欧洲平安 必需 由俄罗斯战南约去会谈 商议。

主持人：周年夜 校，您以为 咱们如今 邪处于新的暗斗 吗？

周波：尔念正在很年夜 水平 上是如许 的。事例上，尔以为 咱们曾经入进一个世界、二场暗斗 的地步 。一个正在欧洲，正在那场冷和后来，暗斗 景象 确定 会正在欧洲重现。另外一个正在亚太地域 ，人们固然 没有公然 评论 ，特殊 是正在民间层里，不外 从特朗普开端 ，美国便年夜 谈“年夜 国合作”，而拜登的政策正在很年夜 水平 上是继续 了特朗普的衣钵。拜登的 对于华政策根本 上是限度合作，但没有产生 矛盾。假如 合作未是限度，这没有便是暗斗 吗？借能是甚么呢？

主持人：最初，闭于那一点，外国正在个中 的感化 若何 ？外国 对于俄罗斯的支撑 ？外国在增强 军事化， 对于台湾威逼 的增长 ？假如 咱们确切 处于一场新暗斗 ，这正在多年夜 水平 上是外国形成的？

周波：外国会站稳手跟，果断 没有移。外国没有是添正在俄罗斯一圆或者者美国一圆的砝码。正在暗斗 期间 ，正在美苏两边 皆很壮大 的情形 高，假如 外国做为砝码，添到哪一圆地仄便会背哪一圆歪斜。但现在 外国正在成长 壮年夜 ，愈来愈无足轻重。不管世界上产生 了甚么，皆不克不及 转变 世界政事战经济背亚太转化的事例，而外国便站正在中间 。

主持人：周年夜 校，异常 感激 您。

周波：开开您。

【听译：外国服装论坛t.vhao.net/祖皂天亚、武一琪，核稿：外国服装论坛t.vhao.net/韩桦】

Stan Grant：ZHOU Bo was a Senior Colonel in the People's Liberation Army from  二00 三 until  二0 二0, and was director of the Center for International Security Cooperation at the Ministry of National Defense. He is now a senior fellow at the Center for International Security and Strategy at Tsinghua University. He joins me from Beijing. It's good to have you with us. Senior Colonel Zhou, can we talk about what China's intentions are in the Solomon Islands必修 Is the intention to establish a military base必修

Zhou Bo：First of all, it's a request from Solomon government for us to provide kind of assistance for maintaining security. The request first of all is from Solomon government. I don't believe that it is true that China would wish to establish a military base there. China only has one logistic supply base in Djibouti to facilitate PLA’s counter-piracy operation in the Gulf of Aden in which we actually had cooperation with Australian Navy as well. So there is no point for China to establish a military base.

Stan Grant：And yet this has been speculated about for some time. You mentioned Djibouti. Of course there is also the port in Pakistan. China has claimed and militarized the disputed islands of the South China Sea and there has been a lot of speculation about establishing a military base in the Pacific. Why wouldn't it then lead people to assume that China does indeed want to establish a military presence in the Solomon Islands必修

Zhou Bo：The answer is very simple, because China has no global military ambition, because China doesn't want to become a global policeman. That is why China so far has only provided humanitarian aid to foreign countries in terms of military operations, be it peacekeeping, counter-piracy, or disaster relief. If you put all Chinese military operations overseas together, you would find they are only in humanitarian areas.

Stan Grant：We're not talking about a global aspiration. What we are talking about is a regional aspiration. And China has been very clear it wants to establish itself as the preponderant power in the region. That's why China is increasing a military presence in the South China Sea. That's why we've seen increased military exercises over Taiwan. And that's why China is increasing its presence in the pacific. Is it not必修

Zhou Bo：I think you put too many things together. Because China has no global military ambition, therefore, it doesn't need to establish a military base in the South Pacific where China，apart from economic benefits, doesn't have much security concern. When you talk about South China Sea, you are actually referring to China's sovereign rights, in the South China Sea (interrupted)

Stan Grant：Disputed and also according to the international maritime court in Hague, it was not to be claimed by any party and China did that anyway.

Zhou Bo：It is disputed, that is for sure, but China has its own claims based on history, based on its own interpretation of the international law. So we in China believe that the islands and adjacent waters in the South China Sea are China's sovereign territory and territorial waters.

Stan Grant：Senior Colonel Zhou, why if indeed, as you say, China does not want to establish a military base or a military port in the Solomons, why the need for the security pact in the first place必修 Why the need to create an opportunity for China to put more military presence under this security pact, which is potentially one of the outcomes. Why the need for it in the first place必修

Zhou Bo：Actually, I would ask you a question: why Australians are so worried about this必修 Because you are certainly closer to the Solomon Islands than China. If you are worried about China’s security pact with the Solomon Islands, you actually are in a better position to provide security to the Solomon Islands. And why don't you do that必修 And why would you oppose to China doing that必修 And China did it because the Solomon Islands asked for it, and I believe as small nations, they probably would try, as all of them would do, a kind of a balance among major powers. And Australia is a major power for the Solomon Islands.

Stan Grant：Australia has had a long relationship with the Solomon Islands and has deployed military there at various times as well and has a long relationship with aids to the Solomons as well. And Scott Morrison, the Australian prime minister is being very clear. He has said that this is a red line. If China was to indeed pursue establishing such a base, that would be considered a red line. I want your interpretation of what that means. How does China see that - a red line必修

Zhou Bo：I don't believe the Australian government is in any capacity to lay any red line for China's cooperation with the Solomon Islands. Let me reiterate again, as my government has said, that China has no intentions whatsoever to establish a military base in the Solomon Islands. Besides, we two are sovereign states, and we certainly are fully entitled to have whatever cooperation we want. This has nothing to do with Australia.

Stan Grant：It does have something to do with Australia because Australia is a pacific nation, and Australia has a long relationship with pacific nations and a long relationship with the country like the Solomon Islands. Clearly, the United States is going to increase its presence in the Solomons as well. And now the prime minister is saying this is a red line. Again, I want to ask you, how does China interpret that language必修 Does that mean the potential conflict必修 If indeed China looks to increase its military presence in the Solomons.

Zhou Bo：I believe you are not doing good enough. Otherwise, why would the Solomon Islands government asked Chinese to help since you are much closer必修 So won't you search your own souls to find out why the situation has actually happened必修 You should actually be in a better position to do that. You should have done better. And why would you blame China because of a request from the Solomon government必修

Stan Grant：Again, you're not really answering the question about the red line and how China would perceive a red line. That is a message coming very clearly from Australia about a line that cannot be crossed. So how does China respond to that必修 How do you interpret language that says this is a red line that Australia will not allow to be crossed必修

Zhou Bo：Well Stan, then let me ask you a question. So how do you interpret this red line必修 Would you specify to us what the red line looks like必修 Let me see then as a Chinese how we can probably not cross the red line. I don't believe Australian government is in any capacity to lay such things like a red line for China. It is ridiculous, it is laughable for me.

Stan Grant：See, language like that, Senior Colonel Zhou, it is laughable questioning Australia’s interests in the Pacific. When you couple that with increasing military presence in the South China Sea, increasing military exercises over Taiwan, threats to reunify or take Taiwan by force, does that not send a signal of increasing Chinese aggression in the region必修

Zhou Bo：I don’t think so. When you talk about the red line, that is extremely ridiculous in that, where is the red line必修 Could you lay a red line in a sovereign state like the Solomon Islands which is not part of Australia必修 So how could you describe it as a red line in terms of cooperation between sovereign states必修 When you talk about Taiwan issue,  一 八 一 countries, including Australia, recognizes it to be part of China. What is the problem if we would possibly use force as the last resort only必修

Stan Grant：What is the problem if you use force必修 Are you seriously saying there is no problem if you use forces against Taiwan when Taiwan sees itself as a country pursuing its own interests, it carries out its own elections, it establishes relationships with the rest of the world必修 From Taipei to say that there is no problem if you use force, force that potentially could trigger a broader conflict involving the United States and Australia and lead to potentially catastrophic loss of life. And you say there is no problem with that必修

Zhou Bo：First of all, you are wrong in describing Taiwan as a country…(interrupted)

Stan Grant：I didn't describe it as a country. There is a One China policy, which you are right, but the One China policy as you know is interpreted in different ways. But you say there is nothing wrong with the use of force against Taiwan, nothing wrong with that必修

Zhou Bo：You’ve certainly misinterpreted me, because we would try our most sincere ways to reunify with Taiwan peacefully, but use of force is still maintained as a last possible resort. If Taiwanese authorities violate three conditions that are laid down clearly in our anti-secession law, in these cases: if they declare independence, we will have to use force; if there are major events that are used by foreign forces that cause separation of Taiwan, we will have to use force; and then if mainland China concludes that all the conditions for peaceful reunification are exhausted, we will have to use force. So these are the three conditions that laid down clearly in anti-secession law. It doesn't mean that we would use force freely or willingly.

Stan Grant：Senior Colonel Zhou, what does Xi Jinping mean when he talks about a global security initiative必修

Zhou Bo：Yeah, he talked about many points. And the most interesting thing is because of the background of his talk. I think what is the most refreshing for any observer is when he talked about how security arrangement should be balanced, effective, and sustainable. Actually, I believe he's referring to the war in Europe, between Russia and Ukraine. Of course, the security in Europe, I believe, now as in the past, is a deal between Russia and Europe, unless until Russia and Europe or even NATO could come to an agreement, the peace and prosperity in Europe is not hopeful.

Stan Grant：He has talked about this initiative as respecting sovereignty. How is Vladimir Putin who has described Xi Jinping as his best friend and visited China during the Winter Olympics and then launched the war against Ukraine the day after the Winter Olympics ended. How on earth could that be seen as respect for sovereignty必修 The very thing that Xi Jinping says that his global initiative is seeking to establish.

Zhou Bo：And that is exactly why he would say that he talked about respect of sovereignty regardless of which countries involved. So that is exactly how he stressed sovereignty, but at the same time, especially in this case, we talked about the legitimate concern over Russia, over NATO 's eastward expansions.

Stan Grant：NATO did not invade Russia. No country has invaded Russia, but Russia has invaded Ukraine.

Zhou Bo：NATO didn't invade Russia, but NATO's endless expansions were warned time and again by all Russian leaders since Mikhail Gorbachev. but the West simply would not heed them at all until this time when it really backfired. So it's not that we only talk about invasion, it's to prevent all these things from happening. You should search your soul to ask yourself why this has happened after all. NATO is growing. It might just claim that its growth demonstrates its popularity. But if the popularity would invite risk to the security of Europe as I said before, any security in Europe has to be arranged between Russia and NATO.

Stan Grant：Senior Colonel Zhou, do you believe that we are now in a new cold war必修

Zhou Bo：I think to a great extent, yes. Actually, I believe we have entered into a world with two cold wars. One is in Europe. After this hot war, definitely the cold war scenario will re-emerge in Europe. And in the Asia-Pacific, people do not talk about it openly, especially at the government level. But Donald Trump has actually ushered in this great power competition. And Joe Biden’s policy is very much a follow-up. And Joe Biden's policy towards China is basically extreme competition short of war. If the competition is already extreme, isn’t it the cold war必修 What else can it be必修

Stan Grant：And just finally on that, what about China's role in that必修 China's support for Russia必修 China’s increasing militarization, and its increasing threats to Taiwan必修 If indeed we are in a new cold war, how much is China contributing to that必修

Zhou Bo：China can stand tall and firm, because China is not a weight that would be added to the Russian side or to the American side. During the cold war, at that time, if you are weaker than two sides that stronger than you, your weight actually becomes important if it is added to one side. But China now is growing, China is becoming more important. Whatever has happened in the world, it could not change the fact that the world’s political and economic shifts are moving toward the Asia-Pacific with China standing right in the center.

Stan Grant：Senior Colonel Zhou, thank you again for giving us your time.

Zhou Bo：Thank you.

原文系不雅 察者网独野稿件，文章内容杂属做者小我 不雅 点，没有代表仄台不雅 点，已经受权，没有患上转载，不然 将穷究 司法 责任。存眷 不雅 察者网微疑guanchacn，逐日  浏览意见意义 文章。